Hubbard v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hubbard v. State

111 S.E. 562, 153 Ga. 161, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 43

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 18, 1922·No. No. 2746·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon newly discovered evidence which is entirely impeaching in cliaracter. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based upon this ground.

2. The verdict is supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon newly discovered evidence which is entirely impeaching in cliaracter. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based upon this ground.

2. The verdict is supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Hubbard v. State, 111 S.E. 562, 153 Ga. 161, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 43 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

111 S.E. 562 (Hubbard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.