Hubbard v. State

647 So. 2d 1081, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 1995 WL 10502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hubbard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 662 So. 2d 746
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 1995·No. Nos. 94-756, 94-815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Earl Hubbard appeals his convictions and sentences imposed after a jury found him guilty of first degree murder,1 robbery with a firearm,2 use of a firearm while committing or attempting to commit a felony,3 aggravated battery,4 and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon5. We find no merit to his appeal except his contention that his dual convictions for robbery with a firearm and the use of a firearm while committing a felony, both of which arose from a single criminal episode, are improper. The state properly concedes error. See Brown v. State, 617 So.2d 744, 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (stating that defendant may not be convicted and sentenced to both possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and armed robbery with a firearm where both crimes occurred during the same criminal transaction), approved, 633 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, we strike Hubbard’s conviction and sentence for using a firearm while committing a felony, but otherwise affirm his remaining convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED as Modified.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hubbard v. State, 647 So. 2d 1081, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 1995 WL 10502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

647 So. 2d 1081 (Hubbard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
617 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Brown
633 So. 2d 1059 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)