Hubbard v. State
563 So. 2d 717, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3232, 1990 WL 60892
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hubbard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7488 →
Opinion
Finding no error in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, we affirm defendant’s conviction for grand theft.
Finding that costs were assessed without prior notice, we strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hubbard v. State, 563 So. 2d 717, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3232, 1990 WL 60892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
563 So. 2d 717 (Hubbard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)