Hubbard v. National RR Passenger Corp.
This text of 691 N.W.2d 457 (Hubbard v. National RR Passenger Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HUBBARD
v.
NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 127240, COA: 246165.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 7, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed whether the Wayne Circuit Court properly dismissed plaintiff's claim under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 USC 51 et seq., because plaintiff failed to present the opinion of an expert that the locomotive cab seat was dangerous or defective. They may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order. The motion for stay is DENIED as unnecessary. MCR 7.302(C)(5)(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 N.W.2d 457, 472 Mich. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-national-rr-passenger-corp-mich-2005.