Hubbard v. Mace

New York Supreme Court

Hubbard v. Mace

17 Johns. 127

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Johns. 127 (Hubbard v. Mace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubbard v. Mace, 17 Johns. 127 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the fact that the outer door had been broken open had been clearly shown, we should have had no difficulty in granting the application. It appears, however, that the usual access to the inner rooms was through the back door and kitchen, which were open; and that the deputy-sheriff used no more force than was necessary to break open the door of the room occupied by the defendant. The motion must be denied. (Cowper, 1.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

If the fact that the outer door had been broken open had been clearly shown, we should have had no difficulty in granting the application. It appears, however, that the usual access to the inner rooms was through the back door and kitchen, which were open; and that the deputy-sheriff used no more force than was necessary to break open the door of the room occupied by the defendant. The motion must be denied. (Cowper, 1.)

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Johns. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-mace-nysupct-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack