Hubbard v. James

1 S.E.2d 436, 187 Ga. 568, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1939
DocketNo. 12688
StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.E.2d 436 (Hubbard v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubbard v. James, 1 S.E.2d 436, 187 Ga. 568, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 428 (Ga. 1939).

Opinion

Jenkins, Justice.

1. Where a suit for the cancellation of an instrument was brought by one as the alleged legally-appointed guardian of ai person alleged to be insane, and where it indisputably appeared that no such legal appointment had been made, and no effort was made to perfect the suit by supplying a proper party plaintiff, the court did not err in sustaining the defendants’ motion to dismiss the petition together with their answer seeking affirmative relief and the response thereto of the allegedly insane person seeking additional affirmative relief in his own name.

2. Accordingly, the judgment of the court dismissing the entire proceedings is affirmed, with direction that the order of dismissal be amended so as to provide that the dismissal be without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties upon the merits of the controversies involved.

Judgment affiriwed, with direction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.E.2d 436, 187 Ga. 568, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-james-ga-1939.