Hubbard v. Hubbard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hubbard v. Hubbard

486 So. 2d 28, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 763, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7097

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1986·No. No. 85-2300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the parties’ settlement agreement, incorporated within the Final Judgment [of] Dissolution of Marriage, provided for reduction of alimony on the occurrence of the former wife’s “remarriage,” (a term specifically defined to include the wife’s cohabitation), we affirm the post-judgment order pertaining to ar-rearages. See Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So.2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gale v. Rose, 455 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Adams v. Adams, 423 So.2d 596, 598 n. 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Schwebke v. Schwebke, 347 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the parties’ settlement agreement, incorporated within the Final Judgment [of] Dissolution of Marriage, provided for reduction of alimony on the occurrence of the former wife’s “remarriage,” (a term specifically defined to include the wife’s cohabitation), we affirm the post-judgment order pertaining to ar-rearages. See Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So.2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gale v. Rose, 455 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Adams v. Adams, 423 So.2d 596, 598 n. 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Schwebke v. Schwebke, 347 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Hubbard v. Hubbard, 486 So. 2d 28, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 763, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7097 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

486 So. 2d 28 (Hubbard v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related