Hubbard v. Harris
This text of 3 Ill. 279 (Hubbard v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This was an action of assumpsit commenced by Harris against Gurdon S. Hubbard and Henry G. Hubbard.
The summons was directed to, and served by, the High Constable of the city of Chicago. The declaration is in the usual form, for money had and received, and in an insimul computassent, stating the indebtedness at Chicago. The defendants appeared and pleaded non assumpsit. The cause was tried by agreement of the parties, by the Court, and judgment rendered, on hearing the proof and allegations, for the plaintiff below.
The plaintiffs in this Court assign for error, that the Court below had no jurisdiction, as there is no averment in the declaration giving the Court jurisdiction.
We held in the case of Beaubien v. Brinckerhoff,
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Judgment affirmed.
Ante 269.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ill. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-harris-ill-1840.