Hubbard v. Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hubbard v. Clay

60 A.D.3d 679, 873 N.Y.S.2d 503

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 679 (Hubbard v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubbard v. Clay, 60 A.D.3d 679, 873 N.Y.S.2d 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a corrected order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Phillips, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 30, 2008, as denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of paralegal fees from the father.

Ordered that the corrected order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of her motion which was for an award of paralegal fees from the father (see generally Kyle v Kyle, 94 AD2d 866 [1983]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a corrected order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Phillips, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 30, 2008, as denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of paralegal fees from the father.

Ordered that the corrected order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of her motion which was for an award of paralegal fees from the father (see generally Kyle v Kyle, 94 AD2d 866 [1983]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 679, 873 N.Y.S.2d 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-clay-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack