Hubbard v. Canton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
This text of 709 N.E.2d 846 (Hubbard v. Canton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stark App. No. 1998CA00089. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On December 7,1998, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional [1474]*1474memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(6).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 N.E.2d 846, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-canton-city-school-dist-bd-of-edn-ohio-1999.