Hubbard v. Brooks

Ohio Supreme Court

Hubbard v. Brooks

738 N.E.2d 378, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1464, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2822

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 17, 2000

Docket00-1684

StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 378 (Hubbard v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubbard v. Brooks, 738 N.E.2d 378, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1464, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2822 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Richland App. No. 00CA67. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Richland County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due November 13, 2000, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee recover from the appellant her costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Richland County to carry this [1465]*1465judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Richland County for entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richland App. No. 00CA67. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Richland County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due November 13, 2000, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee recover from the appellant her costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Richland County to carry this [1465]*1465judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Richland County for entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 N.E.2d 378, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1464, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-brooks-ohio-2000.