Hubbard v. Bowman
This text of 8 Alaska 446 (Hubbard v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Alaska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon examination of the petition filed herein, the court is obliged to find that the petition does not state facts sufficient to justify the issuance of a writ, for the reasons:
That said petition does not state any jurisdictional grounds for issuance of the writ, as, for.instance:
(1) That the minor is a legal resident of the school district of Douglas, nor any facts from which the [448]*448court can determine her legal residence or her .rights to demand admission to the schools of Douglas.
(2) The petition does not state who the defendant, Conrad Bowman, is, what, if any, authority he has over the Douglas schools, and in what capacity or by what authority he refused- permission to the minor to enter said schools, nor is there any reason assigned why he is made a defendant, except that he refused the minor permission to attend school there.
(3) No notice of the application for the writ was either filed in this court or served on the defendant.
In view of this state of the record, and particularly in view of the fact that the court is informed that the child in question has now been permitted to enroll and is now attending the school at Douglas, and that no good purpose can. be served by any continuance of this cause, it is ordered that this matter be held in abeyance pending further developments and the further order of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Alaska 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-bowman-akd-1933.