Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United States

51 Cust. Ct. 286, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3329
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1963
DocketNo. 68176; protest 62/7652 (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 51 Cust. Ct. 286 (Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 51 Cust. Ct. 286, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3329 (cusc 1963).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as item No. 2229, “Santa and snowman head,” is not an artificial fruit, etc., but is in chief value of cotton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cust. Ct. 286, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hub-floral-manufacturing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.