Huazhong Xu v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 649 F. App'x 608 (Huazhong Xu v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Huazhong Xu petitions for review of the decision of the .Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacating the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) grant of protection under the Convention Against Torture and remanding for further proceedings.
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), our review is limited to final orders of removal. See Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir.2002). When, as here, “the BIA remands to the IJ for any reason, no final order of removal exists until all administrative proceedings have concluded.” Abdisalan v. Holder, 774 F.3d 517, 526 (9th Cir.2014) (en banc). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over Xu’s petition for review.
PETITION DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 F. App'x 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huazhong-xu-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.