Huang v. Wei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huang v. Wei

204 A.D.2d 119, 614 N.Y.S.2d 109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 119 (Huang v. Wei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huang v. Wei, 204 A.D.2d 119, 614 N.Y.S.2d 109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered August 17, 1993, which granted plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, and denied defendant’s cross motion to compel acceptance of the answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We reject defendant’s objections to the affidavits of service as unpreserved (Nelson v Times Sq. Stores Corp., 110 AD2d 691), and hold that it was not error for the IAS Court to conclude that defendant’s "conclusory and evasive” affidavit was insufficient to raise any issue as to the propriety of service sufficient to excuse this default on the grounds of lack of notice (CPLR 317, 5015). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered August 17, 1993, which granted plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, and denied defendant’s cross motion to compel acceptance of the answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We reject defendant’s objections to the affidavits of service as unpreserved (Nelson v Times Sq. Stores Corp., 110 AD2d 691), and hold that it was not error for the IAS Court to conclude that defendant’s "conclusory and evasive” affidavit was insufficient to raise any issue as to the propriety of service sufficient to excuse this default on the grounds of lack of notice (CPLR 317, 5015). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 119, 614 N.Y.S.2d 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huang-v-wei-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack