Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 2021
DocketSCPW-20-0000568
StatusPublished

This text of Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin (Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 14-JAN-2021 11:56 AM Dkt. 74 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

HU HONUA BIOENERGY, LLC, Petitioner,

vs.

JAMES P. GRIFFIN, Chairperson, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission; JENNIFER M. POTTER, Commissioner, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission; LEODOLOFF R. ASUNCION, Commissioner, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (AGENCY DOCKET NO. 2017-0122)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT AND/OR FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, 1 JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Hu Honua Bioenergy,

LLC’s petition for extraordinary writ and/or for writ of

mandamus, the answers to the petition, the joinders, the

respective supporting documents, and the record, it appears that

petitioner is currently seeking relief in its direct appeal to

this court in SCOT-20-000569, and, in light of the issues in the

1 At the time Justice Eddins was assigned as a substitute justice in this case, he was a circuit court judge. On December 11, 2020, Justice Eddins was sworn in as a member of this court. appeal and the record therein, petitioner’s request for relief is

more appropriate for consideration in SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX. See Kema

v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ

of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless

the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; it is not intended

to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial

courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in

lieu of normal appellate procedures). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for

extraordinary writ and/or for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 14, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hu-honua-bioenergy-llc-v-griffin-haw-2021.