Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin
This text of Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin (Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 14-JAN-2021 11:56 AM Dkt. 74 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
HU HONUA BIOENERGY, LLC, Petitioner,
vs.
JAMES P. GRIFFIN, Chairperson, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission; JENNIFER M. POTTER, Commissioner, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission; LEODOLOFF R. ASUNCION, Commissioner, State of Hawai#i Public Utilities Commission, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (AGENCY DOCKET NO. 2017-0122)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT AND/OR FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, 1 JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Hu Honua Bioenergy,
LLC’s petition for extraordinary writ and/or for writ of
mandamus, the answers to the petition, the joinders, the
respective supporting documents, and the record, it appears that
petitioner is currently seeking relief in its direct appeal to
this court in SCOT-20-000569, and, in light of the issues in the
1 At the time Justice Eddins was assigned as a substitute justice in this case, he was a circuit court judge. On December 11, 2020, Justice Eddins was sworn in as a member of this court. appeal and the record therein, petitioner’s request for relief is
more appropriate for consideration in SCOT-XX-XXXXXXX. See Kema
v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ
of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless
the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the
alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; it is not intended
to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial
courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in
lieu of normal appellate procedures). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for
extraordinary writ and/or for writ of mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 14, 2021.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hu Honua Bioenergy, LLC v. Griffin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hu-honua-bioenergy-llc-v-griffin-haw-2021.