HTR v. Erie Ins.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
HTR RESTAURANTS, INC. D/B/A/ SIEBS : No. 317 WAL 2021 PUB, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF : A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED : PERSONS, 3382 BABCOCK BOULEVARD, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal PITTSBURGH, PA 15327, : from the Order of the Superior Court :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 100 ERIE : INSURANCE PLACE, ERIE, PA 16530, :
:
Respondents :
JOSEPH TAMBELLINI, INC. D/B/A : No. 318 WAL 2021 JOSEPH TAMBELLINI RESTAURANT, : 5701 BRYANT STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA : 15206, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 100 ERIE : INSURANCE PLACE, ERIE, PA 16530, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
Whether the Superior Court erred as a matter of law in finding that coordination under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 213.1 can only be applied to actions which have been filed at the time coordination is sought?
[317 WAL 2021 and 318 WAL 2021] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
HTR v. Erie Ins. (HTR v. Erie Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.