H.T. v. State

458 So. 2d 802, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15828
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1282
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 802 (H.T. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.T. v. State, 458 So. 2d 802, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency under review is reversed for a new hearing because the lower court improperly failed to hold a Richardson1 hearing prior to admitting incriminating statements allegedly made by the respondent and not previously revealed by the state in discovery. Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1977); Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The state’s contentions that the defense was on prior notice of the statements, see Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978), or acquiesced in the court’s ruling, see Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla.1979), are totally unsustained by the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S.G. v. State
518 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 802, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ht-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.