Hsp Gaming v. City Council for City of Philadelphia

968 A.2d 226, 600 Pa. 502, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 464
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 24, 2009
Docket179 EM 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 968 A.2d 226 (Hsp Gaming v. City Council for City of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hsp Gaming v. City Council for City of Philadelphia, 968 A.2d 226, 600 Pa. 502, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 464 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2009, it is hereby ordered as follows:

(1) the City of Philadelphia is directed to issue the foundation permit to HSP forthwith, and without condition;

(2) in furtherance of this Court’s December 3, 2007 Per Curiam Opinion and Order in HSP Gaming, L.P. v. City Council for the City of Philadelphia, 595 Pa. 508, 939 A.2d 273 (2007), and pursuant to Section 1506 of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act, 4 Pa.C.S. § 1506, the Honorable John W. Herron of the First Judicial District is hereby appointed as Master in the above-captioned matter. The Master shall have full authority to consider and resolve disputes regarding the issuance of permits, approvals, licenses, *503 or other authorizations or actions required by or from the City of Philadelphia for the construction, use and occupancy of HSP’s licensed gaming facility; including such disputes that arise from the December 17, 2007 Tax Settlement and Development Agreement; and

(3) the Master shall address any such disputes, including requests for attorneys’ fees and costs, in an expeditious manner and shall file a report with this Court setting forth the status and a summary of the proceedings within ten (10) days after completion of such proceedings.

The City of Philadelphia’s Application for Leave to File a Supplemental Response is granted. The City of Philadelphia’s Application for Oral Argument is denied.

Jurisdiction is retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ABB C-E Services, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
968 A.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
968 A.2d 226, 600 Pa. 502, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hsp-gaming-v-city-council-for-city-of-philadelphia-pa-2009.