Hsiao v. City of Reno

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 29, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00256
StatusUnknown

This text of Hsiao v. City of Reno (Hsiao v. City of Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hsiao v. City of Reno, (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 KARL S. HALL Reno City Attorney 2 ALICE K. HERBOLSHEIMER 3 Deputy City Attorney Nevada State Bar No. 6389 4 herbolsheimera@reno.gov HOLLY S. PARKER 5 Deputy City Attorney 6 Nevada State Bar No. 10181 parkerh@reno.gov 7 Post Office Box 1900 Reno, Nevada 89505 8 (775) 334-2050 9 Attorneys for Defendant City of Reno 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 NIKA HSIAO, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-00256-CLB 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. ORDER ADOPTING 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE CITY OF RENO and DOES I-X, ORDER 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 NIKA HSIAO, by and through her undersigned counsel, Ronald J. Dreher, Esq., and 21 Defendant CITY OF RENO, by and through its undersigned counsel, Karl S. Hall, Reno City 22 Attorney, and Holly S. Parker and Alice K. Herbolsheimer, Deputy City Attorneys (collectively 23 “the Parties”), hereby agree and stipulate to the entry of a Protective Order as follows: 24 I. Reason for the Order: The Parties have requested or may request production of 25 documentation that the Parties contend includes confidential information or highly personal 26 private information, including but not limited to employment files and information, personnel 27 records, medical records, and possibly other documentation that the Parties would object to 28 production of as confidential and private documentation, or for which they may seek a protective Reno City 1 order, if the documentation described herein were not protected by this Stipulated Protective 2 Order. The purpose of this Stipulated Protective Order is to facilitate the Parties in the discovery 3 process. However, the mere existence of this Protective Order does not waive the Parties’ right 4 to object to production and redact certain documentation or information. If any such objection 5 is made and the parties are unable to agree, the production or protection of the documentation or 6 information shall be submitted to the Court for review and decision concerning production or 7 protection. 8 II. Confidential Documentation and Information: 9 A. The Parties may subject any documentation they have previously 10 produced or produce hereafter, or that any non-party produces in response to a subpoena or 11 otherwise, to the protections of this Stipulated Protective Order by: 12 1. Marking any document or response to discovery which that party 13 considers in good faith to contain information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure or Nevada law as “confidential” by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise 15 set forth herein. Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page 16 and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 17 2. A party may designate information disclosed during a deposition 18 or in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the 19 record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. 20 3. A party may also designate in writing, within twenty (20) days 21 after receipt of discovery responses or of a deposition transcript that specific pages of the 22 transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” documentation or information. 23 Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, 24 the Parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph VIII below. After any 25 documentation or information has been designated as confidential, the designated documentation 26 or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according 27 to the procedures described in paragraph VIII below, and counsel for all parties shall be 28 responsible for marking all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their Reno City 1 possession or control with the specific confidential designation. The documents subject to the 2 claim of confidentiality shall be identified either by clearly describing the document or by 3 referring to the document by its Bates-stamp numbers, (e.g., COR-0000). 4 4. A party may designate as “confidential” documents or discovery 5 materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all Parties of the relevant 6 document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents 7 or other discovery materials. Any party may voluntarily disclose to others without restriction 8 any information designated by that party as confidential, although a document may lose its 9 confidential status if it is made public by the party designating the information as confidential. 10 B. Documents designated as set forth above shall hereafter be referred to as 11 the “confidential documentation.” The term “confidential documentation” shall include any 12 information (“confidential information”) obtained from the confidential documentation, and this 13 Stipulated Protective Order prohibits the use or disclosure of such confidential information to 14 the same extent as the confidential documentation. 15 III. General Prohibition: 16 Confidential documentation and information shall be used solely for the preparation, 17 prosecution and defense of the present case. Except as specified in Paragraph IV below, access 18 to confidential documentation and information shall be limited to the Court, its officers, court 19 reporters, counsel for the parties and counsel’s staff, the parties’ litigation representatives and 20 principals, their staff members assisting in the preparation, prosecution and defense of this case, 21 any authors or recipients of the confidential documentation, and witnesses. Except as specified 22 below, no person with access to confidential documentation or information shall reveal or 23 discuss such confidential documentation or information to or with any person who is not entitled 24 to receive such information, except as set forth herein. 25 IV. Third Party Access: Counsel for any party may give access to the confidential 26 documentation or information to independent experts and their staff, consulting firms, or other 27 independent contractors actually retained or employed to advise or assist such counsel and to 28 Reno City 1 whom it is necessary that the confidential documentation and information be disclosed for 2 purposes of this case, provided that: 3 A. Before access to the confidential documentation and information are 4 given to any person pursuant Section IV, that person shall be informed by counsel proposing to 5 give access of, and shall agree to be bound by, the following provisions: 6 1. He or she shall not disclose the confidential documentation or 7 information to any person to whom this Stipulated Protective Order does not provide access. 8 2. He or she shall make no copies, compilations, or summaries of the 9 confidential documentation and information, except in connection with the preparation, 10 prosecution and defense of this case and if such copies, compilations or summaries are made, 11 neither those documents, nor the information contained therein shall be disclosed to any person 12 other than those permitted by this Stipulated Protective Order. 13 3. Within thirty (30) days after any judgment is entered in this matter, 14 resolution is reached, or the appeal process is concluded, whichever is later, he or she shall 15 return all copies, compilations, or summaries of the confidential documentation and information 16 contained therein to the attorney for the party who provided the confidential documentation or 17 information, or erase and destroy all copies (including electronic copies), compilations, or 18 summaries containing confidential documentation or information. 19 B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hsiao v. City of Reno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hsiao-v-city-of-reno-nvd-2024.