HSD v. Arnaudville

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date.

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel., 9 and ANGELA HAZELET,

10 Petitioners-Appellees,

11 v. NO. 30,761

13 Respondent-Appellant.

15 Angela J. Jewell, District Judge

16 New Mexico Human Services Department 17 Reina Owen DeMartino 18 Albuquerque, NM

19 for Appellees

20 Mark Arnaudville 21 Albuquerque, NM

22 Pro Se Appellant

24 KENNEDY, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance in part and summary reversal in part was proposed in a

2 second notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum in opposition has

3 been filed by any party and the time for doing so has expired.

4 Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the second notice of proposed summary

5 disposition, the district court’s order is AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN

8 _______________________________ 9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 _________________________ 12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

13 _________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge