HSC Medical Inc. v. Masters

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2024
Docket6:21-cv-01022
StatusUnknown

This text of HSC Medical Inc. v. Masters (HSC Medical Inc. v. Masters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HSC Medical Inc. v. Masters, (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

BGX E-HEALTH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 6:21-cv-1022-WWB-LHP

DARREN NEIL MASTERS, GRANITE INVESTMENT GLOBAL US LLC, SN- SCP LLC and CW FINANCIAL CONSULTING LLC,

Defendants

ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY PLAINTIFF (Doc. No. 79) FILED: January 22, 2024

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

MOTION: JOINT REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (Doc. No. 81) FILED: January 22, 2024 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as moot. Upon review of the Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff and attached Assignment of Judgment (Doc. Nos. 79, 79-1), as well as the Stipulation and Consent

to Substitution of Party Plaintiff and Entry of Judgment in Garnishment (Doc. No. 85), the Motion (Doc. No. 79) is GRANTED. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c); Barker v. Jackson Nat. Life Ins. Co., 163 F.R.D. 364, 365 (N.D. Fla. 1995). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to amend the case caption to substitute HSC Medical, Inc., as the

named Party-Plaintiff in this matter. In light of the representations made in the Stipulation and Consent to Substitution of Party Plaintiff and Entry of Judgment in Garnishment (Doc. No. 85),

as well as a review of the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release (Doc. No. 88, filed under seal), the Court finds that an evidentiary hearing is no longer required to resolve the pending Renewed Motion for Entry of Final Garnishment Judgment (Doc. No. 75). Accordingly, the Joint Request for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. No. 81) is DENIED AS MOOT. The undersigned will address the pending motion and stipulation regarding entry of a final judgment in garnishment by a separate report and recommendation to the Presiding District Judge. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 2, 2024.

| ayn LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barker v. Jackson National Life Insurance
163 F.R.D. 364 (N.D. Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
HSC Medical Inc. v. Masters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hsc-medical-inc-v-masters-flmd-2024.