HSBC Mtge. Servs., Inc. v. Abbott
This text of 2011 Ohio 3032 (HSBC Mtge. Servs., Inc. v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as HSBC Mtge. Servs., Inc. v. Abbott, 2011-Ohio-3032.]
COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
HSBC MORTGAGE SERVIES, INC. JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. -vs- Case No. 10-CA-129 CHARLES ABBOTT
Defendant-Appellant OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Licking County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 10-CV-725
JUDGMENT: Affirmed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: June 20, 2011
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
JASON A. WHITACRE BRIAN K. DUNCAN LAURA C. INFANTE Duncan Simonette, Inc. KATHRYN M. EYSTER 580 South High Street, Suite 100 The Law Offices of Columubus, Ohio 43215 John D. Clunk, Co., L.P.A. 4500 Courthouse Blvd., Ste. 400 Stow, Ohio 44224 Licking County, Case No. 10-CA-129 2
Hoffman, J.
{¶1} Defendant-appellant Charles Abbott appeals the October 19, 2010
Judgment Entry entered by the Licking County Court of Common Pleas denying his
motion to vacate the entry of default judgment against him and in favor of Plaintiff-
appellee HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶2} On August 25, 2005, Appellant executed an adjustable rate note in favor
of Popular Financial Services, LLC, and a mortgage in favor of Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc. HSBC received an assignment of the note and mortgage,
recorded May 7, 2010.
{¶3} On May 6, 2010, Appellee filed a complaint in foreclosure in the Licking
County Court of Common Pleas against Appellant. Service was issued on all parties
the same day. Appellant was personally served by private process server on May 10,
2010. HSBC moved the trial court for default judgment on June 10, 2010.
{¶4} The trial court entered default judgment in favor of HSBC via Judgment
Entry on June 21, 2010. On July 1, 2010, Bank of New York filed its Praecipe for Order
of Sale with the Court. A Sheriff’s Sale of the property was to be held on November 5,
2010.
{¶5} On September 17, 2010, Appellant filed a motion to vacate the default
judgment, motion to stay execution, request for mediation and motion for leave to file an
answer out of time, alleging his failure to file an answer was the result of excusable
neglect. Licking County, Case No. 10-CA-129 3
{¶6} On September 29, 2010, HSBC opposed the motion. On October 18,
2010, the trial court conducted an oral hearing on Appellant’s motion. No transcript was
made a part of the record in this appeal.
{¶7} Via Judgment Entry of October 19, 2010, the trial court denied Appellant’s
motion to vacate the default judgment.
{¶8} Appellant now appeals, assigning as error:
{¶9} “I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO VACATE ITS JUNE
21, 2010 JUDGMENT ENTRY BASED ON CIV.R. 60(B)(5) AND/OR CIV.R. 60(B)(1).”
{¶10} Ohio Civil Rule 60(B) reads,
{¶11} “(B) Mistakes; inadvertence; excusable neglect; newly discovered
evidence; fraud; etc
{¶12} “On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party
or his legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following
reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered
evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a
new trial under Rule 59(B); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or
extrinsic), misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment
has been satisfied, released or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based
has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment
should have prospective application; or (5) any other reason justifying relief from the
judgment. The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2)
and (3) not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or Licking County, Case No. 10-CA-129 4
taken. A motion under this subdivision (B) does not affect the finality of a judgment or
suspend its operation.
{¶13} “The procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by motion
as prescribed in these rules.”
{¶14} The moving party must demonstrate he is entitled to relief on one of the
grounds set forth in Civil Rule 60(B)(1) through (5), that he has a meritorious defense,
and the motion is made within a reasonable time. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. Arc
Industries, Inc. (1976), 47 Ohio St.2d 146. These requirements are independent and in
conjunctive; thus, the test is not fulfilled if any one of the requirements is not met. Id.
Further, the movant must establish the above requirements by operative facts
presented in a form that meets evidentiary standards such as affidavits, depositions,
transcripts of evidence, written stipulations or other evidence given under oath. East
Ohio Gas Co. v. Walker (1978), 59 Ohio App. 2d 216.
{¶15} On appeal, the proper standard of review of a trial court’s decision on a
Civil Rule 60(B) motion is abuse of discretion. Strack v. Pelton (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d
172; Quebodeaux v. Quebodeaux (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 502.
{¶16} As set forth in the statement of the case, supra, Appellant has not
provided this Court with a transcript of the proceedings before the trial court on October
18, 2010, at which time the trial court conducted a hearing on Appellant’s motion to
vacate. Ohio Appellate Rule 9 states,
{¶17} “(B) The transcript of proceedings; duty of appellant to order; notice
to appellee if partial transcript is ordered Licking County, Case No. 10-CA-129 5
{¶18} “At the time of filing the notice of appeal the appellant, in writing, shall
order from the reporter a complete transcript or a transcript of the parts of the
proceedings not already on file as the appellant considers necessary for inclusion in the
record and file a copy of the order with the clerk. The reporter is the person appointed
by the court to transcribe the proceedings for the trial court whether by stenographic,
phonogramic, or photographic means, by the use of audio electronic recording devices,
or by the use of video recording systems. If there is no officially appointed reporter,
App.R. 9(C) or 9(D) may be utilized. If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a
finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the weight of the
evidence, the appellant shall include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to
the findings or conclusion.”
{¶19} Appellant bears the burden of showing error by reference to matters in the
record. Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 197; State v. Prince
(1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 694. An appellate court can reach its decision only upon facts
which are adduced in the trial court’s proceeding and cannot base its decision on
allegations founded upon facts from outside of the record. Merillat v. Fulton Cty. Bd. Of
Commrs. (1991), 73 Ohio App.3d 459.
{¶20} When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors
are omitted from the record, the reviewing court has nothing to pass upon and thus, as
to those assigned errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity of the
lower court's proceedings, and affirm.” Knapp, supra.
{¶21} Because Appellant has failed to provide this Court with a transcript of the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hsbc-mtge-servs-inc-v-abbott-ohioctapp-2011.