HSBC Bank USA, NA. v. Kalenborn

2023 NY Slip Op 02108
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 2023
DocketIndex No. 2981/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 02108 (HSBC Bank USA, NA. v. Kalenborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HSBC Bank USA, NA. v. Kalenborn, 2023 NY Slip Op 02108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

HSBC Bank USA, NA. v Kalenborn (2023 NY Slip Op 02108)
HSBC Bank USA, NA. v Kalenborn
2023 NY Slip Op 02108
Decided on April 26, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 26, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2020-06438
(Index No. 2981/14)

[*1]HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., respondent,

v

Margaret Kalenborn, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.


Charles Wallshein, Melville, NY, for appellants.

Reed Smith LLP, New York, NY (Andrew B. Messite and Michael V. Margarella of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Margaret Kalenborn and Douglas Kalenborn appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Thomas F. Whelan, J.), dated June 10, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, (1) denied that branch of their motion which was for a hearing to determine whether sanctions should be imposed upon the plaintiff for failing to negotiate in good faith pursuant to CPLR 3408, and (2) denied that branch of their cross-motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them based upon the plaintiff's failure to comply with RPAPL 1304.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the separate appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kalenborn, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2021-06195; decided herewith]).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., RIVERA, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 02108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hsbc-bank-usa-na-v-kalenborn-nyappdiv-2023.