Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/H.S. v. State

H.S. v. State

583 So. 2d 807, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8318, 1991 WL 152949
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2612
StatusPublished

This text of 583 So. 2d 807 (H.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.S. v. State, 583 So. 2d 807, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8318, 1991 WL 152949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the concession by the State of Florida which correctly agrees “that the State failed to produce evidence showing the value of the object that was involved in the grand theft ... ”, the adjudication of grand theft is reversed, with this case being remanded to the trial court for the purpose of entering an adjudication for pet-it theft in connection with Count II of the Petition. See Cofield v. State, 474 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cofield v. State
474 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 So. 2d 807, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8318, 1991 WL 152949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hs-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.