Hryniw v. Garzone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hryniw v. Garzone

49 A.D.2d 875, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 875 (Hryniw v. Garzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hryniw v. Garzone, 49 A.D.2d 875, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the [876]*876Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated March 17, 1975, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County, dated March 15, 1974, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for an apportionment of damages. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. This court’s recent determination in Tarantola v Williams (48 AD2d 552) is dispositive of the issues raised on this appeal. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., concurs under the constraint of Tarantola v Williams (48 AD2d 552).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the [876]*876Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated March 17, 1975, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County, dated March 15, 1974, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for an apportionment of damages. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. This court’s recent determination in Tarantola v Williams (48 AD2d 552) is dispositive of the issues raised on this appeal. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., concurs under the constraint of Tarantola v Williams (48 AD2d 552).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 875, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hryniw-v-garzone-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack