Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 28, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00449·Unknown

Opinion

Candice T. Zee, Bar No. 227453 2 czee@vedderprice.com Grace L. Urban, pro hac vice 3 gurban@vedderprice.com 1925 Century Park East, Suite 1900 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 T: +1 424 204 7700 5 F: +1 424 204 7702 6 Attorneys for Defendant ADVENTIST HEALTH AND RIDEOUT 7

Mark E. Ellis, Bar No. 127159 9 mellis@ellislawgroup.com Anthony P.J. Valenti, Bar No. 284542 10 avalenti@ellislawgroup.com 1425 River Park Drive, Suite 400 11 Sacramento, CA 95815 T: +1 916 283 8820 12 F: +1 916 283 8821

13 Attorneys for Plaintiff GLENDA HRONES 14

15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 18 19 GLENDA HRONES, Case No. 2:20-CV-0449-KJM-KJN 20 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 v. Judge: Chief District Judge Kimberly J. 22 Mueller RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DBA Magistrate: Judge Kendall J. Newman 23 ADVENTIST HEALTH AND RIDEOUT, and DOES 1 through 10, Trial Date: None Set 24 Date Action Filed: February 27, 2020 Defendant. 25 26

27 28 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or 3 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 4 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff Glenda 5 Hrones and Defendant Rideout Memorial Hospital d/b/a Adventist Health and Rideout 6 (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 7 Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 8 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public 9 disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 10 treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in 11 Section 12.3, below, that this Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 12 seal; Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller’s Standing Order and Local Rule 141 set forth the procedures 13 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 14 the Court to file material under seal. 16 This action is likely to involve proprietary and confidential personnel information, medical 17 information, and other financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special 18 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action 19 is warranted. 20 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, 21 confidential business or financial information, including but not limited to information regarding 22 confidential business practices or commercial information (including information implicating 23 privacy rights of third parties, including but not limited to, personnel information and health 24 information), and information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 25 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case 26 decisions, or common law. 27 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of 28 disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties 1 are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 2 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end 3 of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in 4 this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for 5 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been 6 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 7 of the public record of this case. 8 2. DEFINITIONS 9 2.1 Action: Glenda Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital d/b/a Adventist 10 Health & Rideout, Case No. 2:20-CV-0449-KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal.). 11 2.2 Court: Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, Magistrate Judge Kendall 12 J. Newman, or any other judge to which this Action may be assigned, including the Court staff 13 participating in such proceedings. 14 2.3 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 15 information or items under this Order. 16 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 17 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal 18 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 19 CONFIDENTIAL information includes any documents, testimony or information that the 20 Designating Party in good faith believes to contain non-public information that is entitled to 21 confidential treatment under applicable law, including HIPAA. 22 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 23 support staff). 24 2.6 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or 25 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 26 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” 27 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of 28 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 1 things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 2 responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.8 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 4 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 5 witness or as a consultant in this Action. 6 2.9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Extremely sensitive 7 “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would 8 create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 9 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL information includes Confidential Information or Items that the 10 Designating Party in good faith believes contains trade secrets, confidential, and/or proprietary 11 information of the most sensitive nature, including, without limitation, documents pertaining to 12 confidential litigation matters unrelated to Plaintiff and/or information that qualifies for protection 13 pursuant to HIPAA. 14 2.10 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. 15 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 16 2.11 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 17 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 18 2.12 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party to 19 this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this Action and have appeared in this 20 Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that 21 Party, and includes support staff. 22 2.13 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 23 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 24 2.14 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 25 Discovery Material in this Action. 26 2.15 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 27 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 28 1 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 2 subcontractors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital (Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.