Hronek v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Hronek v. Maryland

201 F. App'x 154

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2006·No. No. 06-1561·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Peter Hronek appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hronek v. Maryland, No. 1:06-cv00492-RDB (D.Md., Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Peter Hronek appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hronek v. Maryland, No. 1:06-cv00492-RDB (D.Md., Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hronek v. Maryland, 201 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

201 F. App'x 154 (Hronek v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.