Hrko v. Office of the State Auditor

West Virginia Court of Claims

Hrko v. Office of the State Auditor

13 Ct. Cl. 104

DecidedJanuary 22, 1980

DocketCC-79-221a; CC-79-230a; CC-79-417; CC-79-232a; CC-79-233a; CC-79-235; CC-79-237; CC-79-240; CC-79-246a; CC-79-248; CC-79-249; CC-79-329a; CC-79-250; CC-79-251

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 104 (Hrko v. Office of the State Auditor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hrko v. Office of the State Auditor, 13 Ct. Cl. 104 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

These claims have been consolidated by the Court on its own motion since all of the claims are governed by the same principles of law.

The claimants are attorneys who served as counsel for indigents in mental hygiene hearings pursuant to the provisions of West Virginia Code, Chapter 27, Article 5. Claimants’ fees were denied by the respondent because the fund was exhausted.

The factual situations in these claims are identical to that in Richard K. Swartling, et al. v. Office of the State Auditor, issued on November 5, 1979. Accordingly, the Court hereby grants awards to the claimants as follows:

JohnS. Hrko . $ 80.00

Ribel & Julian. 327.50

J. M. Tully. 62.50

James C. Recht. 122.00

Harold S. Yost. 135.00

Roy D. Law. 459.00

[107]*107Harold B. Eagle. 115.00

Glenn O. Schumacher . 303.33

James M. Casey. 538.00

Simmons & Martin . 440.00

Joseph C. Hash, Jr. 160.00

James M. Cook, Jr. 111.69

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI