HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin
This text of 113 So. 3d 1035 (HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to Appellants as we find no abuse of the court’s discretion. See T &W Developers, Inc. v. Salmonsen, 31 So.3d 298, 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). However, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants an award of costs. See Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So.3d 1132, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). On remand, the trial court shall award Appellants their reasonable, taxable costs.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 So. 3d 1035, 2013 WL 2359489, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hrgs-inc-v-goodwin-fladistctapp-2013.