HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin

113 So. 3d 1035, 2013 WL 2359489, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8581

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2013·No. No. 5D11-3651·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to Appellants as we find no abuse of the court’s discretion. See T &W Developers, Inc. v. Salmonsen, 31 So.3d 298, 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). However, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants an award of costs. See Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So.3d 1132, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). On remand, the trial court shall award Appellants their reasonable, taxable costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to Appellants as we find no abuse of the court’s discretion. See T &W Developers, Inc. v. Salmonsen, 31 So.3d 298, 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). However, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants an award of costs. See Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So.3d 1132, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). On remand, the trial court shall award Appellants their reasonable, taxable costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin, 113 So. 3d 1035, 2013 WL 2359489, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8581 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

113 So. 3d 1035 (HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related