Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/HPT v. Commissioner of Correction

HPT v. Commissioner of Correction

41 A.3d 1053, 304 Conn. 924, 2012 WL 1764221, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in HPT v. Commissioner of Correction. Read the opinion of the Court — 304 Conn. 928 →
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 25, 2012·No. Not in source·Published

Opinion

41 A.3d 1053 (2012)
304 Conn. 924

H.P.T.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Not in source.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 25, 2012.

Michael Proto, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Adele V. Patterson, senior assistant public Defender, in opposition.

The respondent's amended petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 Conn.App. 480, 14 A.3d 1047 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the remedy fashioned by the habeas court for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HPT v. Commissioner of Correction, 41 A.3d 1053, 304 Conn. 924, 2012 WL 1764221, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 195 (Colo. 2012).

41 A.3d 1053 (HPT v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. P. T. v. Commissioner of Correction
14 A.3d 1047 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)