Hoyt v. United States
This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 527 (Hoyt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain importations of metal bird cages and stands.
The respective parties have submitted said appeals for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the metal bird cages and stands, and the issues, are the same in all material respects as those before the court in Spratts Patent America, Ltd. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 583, Reap. Dec. 8285, the record in which case has been incorporated herein. It has been further agreed that there is no foreign, export, or United States value, as those values are defined in section 402 (c) (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c) (d) and (e)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, for such or similar merchandise, and that the- statutory cost of production of the subject importations is equal to the invoice price, less discounts of 2 per centum and 2K per centum.
On the agreed facts, I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the metal bird cages [528]*528and stands here involved, and that such value is equal to the invoice price, less discounts of 2 per centum and 2% per centum.
Judgment will issue accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Cust. Ct. 527, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-united-states-cusc-1954.