Hoyt v. State of Florida

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2025-2223

_____________________________

JUSTIN T. HOYT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James Matthew Colaw, Judge.

June 17, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Kingry v. State, 28 So. 3d 173, 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“It is apparent from the record that appellant’s agreement to a sexual predator designation was a bargained-for part of the plea agreement. Having freely and voluntarily entered into the agreement and accepted its benefits, appellant may not now seek to be relieved of one of the burdens imposed upon him pursuant to the agreement.”).

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Justin T. Hoyt, pro se, Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.