Hoyt v. Shelp
20 Abb. N. Cas. 10
This text of 20 Abb. N. Cas. 10 (Hoyt v. Shelp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoyt v. Shelp, 20 Abb. N. Cas. 10 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).
Opinion
This court has held that a party may amend his pleadings after service of a demurrer. Having done this within the time provided by law, the defendant’s practice is regular. The demurrer is superseded by the service of the answer.
Motion denied; no costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 Abb. N. Cas. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-shelp-nynyccityct-1887.