Home/City of New York Municipal Court/Hoyt v. Shelp

Hoyt v. Shelp

20 Abb. N. Cas. 10
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided November 15, 1887·Published

Opinion

Browne, J.

This court has held that a party may amend his pleadings after service of a demurrer. Having done this within the time provided by law, the defendant’s practice is regular. The demurrer is superseded by the service of the answer.

Motion denied; no costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoyt v. Shelp, 20 Abb. N. Cas. 10 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

20 Abb. N. Cas. 10 (Hoyt v. Shelp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.