Hoyt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

228 N.E.2d 818, 19 N.Y.2d 998, 281 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1407
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 1, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 N.E.2d 818 (Hoyt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoyt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 228 N.E.2d 818, 19 N.Y.2d 998, 281 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1407 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Burke dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the insured’s death was not “ accidental ” within the sense of the insurance policy sued upon. Taking no part: Judge Van Voorhis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hoats
102 Misc. 2d 1004 (New York County Courts, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 N.E.2d 818, 19 N.Y.2d 998, 281 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-ny-1967.