Hoyt v. Inc. Village of Cedarhurst
280 A.D. 809, 113 N.Y.S.2d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an action for a judgment declaring a zoning ordinance to be unconstitutional in restricting the use of specific property to residential purposes, judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoyt v. Inc. Village of Cedarhurst, 280 A.D. 809, 113 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
280 A.D. 809 (Hoyt v. Inc. Village of Cedarhurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon
282 A.D. 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)