Hoyt v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoyt v. Hoyt

220 A.D. 729

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoyt v. Hoyt. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D. 773 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1927·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of New RoeheEe reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. We think that the letter of January 13, 1922, and the acceptance by plaintiff of the payments made by defendant thereunder, constitute a binding and enforcible agreement, and that the evidence did not show any modification thereof. KeEy, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the City Court of New RoeheEe reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. We think that the letter of January 13, 1922, and the acceptance by plaintiff of the payments made by defendant thereunder, constitute a binding and enforcible agreement, and that the evidence did not show any modification thereof. KeEy, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Hoyt v. Hoyt, 220 A.D. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

220 A.D. 729 (Hoyt v. Hoyt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.