Hoyt v. Gelston & Schenck
8 Johns. 179
Opinion
The cause in the district court has been unnecessarily delayed on the part of the public prosecutor ; for the officers of the United States may, in case of the sickness of the judge of the district court, remove the cause into the circuit court. An indefinite imparlance, therefore, is unreasonable, and ought not to be granted.
Further time to plead was, however, given, on the motion of the defendant’s counsel, until the 1st July next.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoyt v. Gelston & Schenck, 8 Johns. 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
8 Johns. 179 (Hoyt v. Gelston & Schenck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nicolls v. Rodgers
18 F. Cas. 234 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1847)