Hoyt v. Gelston
15 Johns. 221
Opinion
This court cannot pronounce any new judgment in this case. It can only carry into effect the judgment of the supreme court of the United States. In the computation of interest, therefore, the taxing officer must not go beyond the time of the judgment of affirmance, that being [222] the last act of the court above. The practice, in this respect, in our state courts, is regulated by statute, which cannot apply.to this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoyt v. Gelston, 15 Johns. 221 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).
15 Johns. 221 (Hoyt v. Gelston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Booth v. Ableman
20 Wis. 602 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1866)