Hoyt v. . Copeland
153 S.E. 844, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 262
This text of 153 S.E. 844 (Hoyt v. . Copeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoyt v. . Copeland, 153 S.E. 844, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 262 (N.C. 1930).
Opinion
No error is apparent on the record, and, as the case involves no new question of law, it seems of little avail to set out the will or the facts inducing its interpretation. That the decision is authorized, would seem to be supported by what was said in Trust Co. v. Lentz, 196 N. C., 398, 145 S. E., 776.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hayes v. Turner
391 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Holt v. Holt
61 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 844, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-copeland-nc-1930.