Hoyt v. Carkin

Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan

Hoyt v. Carkin

1 Mich. N.P. 44

CourtCircuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan

DecidedJuly 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. N.P. 44 (Hoyt v. Carkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoyt v. Carkin, 1 Mich. N.P. 44 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

This action is a special action of trespass on the case, brought to recover damages for depositing earth on the plaintiff’s land, covered with water in Saginaw river,

[45]*45The plaintiff obtained a verdict for $50., and now moves for judgment for costs, as well as for the damages. The claim for costs is opposed. By Sul. 2, § 5597, C. L., the plaintiff is allowed costs, if he recover a verdict in an action, in which the title to land shall come in question. In this case, the plaintiff sued as owner, and claimed damages for injury to the inheritance.

Costs are recoverable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

This action is a special action of trespass on the case, brought to recover damages for depositing earth on the plaintiff’s land, covered with water in Saginaw river,

[45]*45The plaintiff obtained a verdict for $50., and now moves for judgment for costs, as well as for the damages. The claim for costs is opposed. By Sul. 2, § 5597, C. L., the plaintiff is allowed costs, if he recover a verdict in an action, in which the title to land shall come in question. In this case, the plaintiff sued as owner, and claimed damages for injury to the inheritance.

Costs are recoverable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mich. N.P. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-carkin-micirct10-1869.