Hoyme v. Brakken

2004 WI 26, 677 N.W.2d 233, 270 Wis. 2d 55, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 226
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 25, 2004
Docket02-1790
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2004 WI 26 (Hoyme v. Brakken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoyme v. Brakken, 2004 WI 26, 677 N.W.2d 233, 270 Wis. 2d 55, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 226 (Wis. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Hoyme v. Brakken, No. 02-1790, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 22, 2003), should be affirmed or reversed.

Justice JON E WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAM-SON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and Justice PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK would reverse. Justice DIANE S. SYKES did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Brakken v. Hoyme
543 U.S. 1021 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 WI 26, 677 N.W.2d 233, 270 Wis. 2d 55, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyme-v-brakken-wis-2004.