Hoyme v. Brakken

2004 WI 26, 677 N.W.2d 233, 270 Wis. 2d 55, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 226
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2004·No. 02-1790·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Hoyme v. Brakken, No. 02-1790, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 22, 2003), should be affirmed or reversed.

Justice JON E WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAM-SON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and Justice PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK would reverse. Justice DIANE S. SYKES did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoyme v. Brakken, 2004 WI 26, 677 N.W.2d 233, 270 Wis. 2d 55, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 226 (Wis. 2004).

2004 WI 26 (Hoyme v. Brakken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Brakken v. Hoyme
543 U.S. 1021 (Supreme Court, 2004)