Hoyle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hoyle v. State

137 S.W. 355

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 5, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 S.W. 355 (Hoyle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoyle v. State, 137 S.W. 355 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinions

HARPER, J.

The appellant in this case was charged with the offense of making an aggravated assault on Lula Canton. Upon a trial he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25, from which judgment he appeals.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal on account of the insufficiency of the recognizance. The recognizance does not show that defendant had been convicted of any offense, and, not being within the terms of the statute, the motion is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

The appellant in this case was charged with the offense of making an aggravated assault on Lula Canton. Upon a trial he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25, from which judgment he appeals.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal on account of the insufficiency of the recognizance. The recognizance does not show that defendant had been convicted of any offense, and, not being within the terms of the statute, the motion is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.W. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyle-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack