Hoyle v. State

137 S.W. 855, 62 Tex. Crim. 297, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 1911·No. No. 1103.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

The appellant in this case was charged with the offense of making an aggravated assault on Lula Canton. Upon a trial he was convicted and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25, from which judgment he appeals.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this appeal on account of the insufficiency of the recognizance. The recognizance does not show that defendant had been convicted of any offense, and not being within the terms of the statute, the motion is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoyle v. State, 137 S.W. 855, 62 Tex. Crim. 297, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256 (Tex. 1911).

137 S.W. 855 (Hoyle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fields v. State
139 S.W. 978 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)