Hoyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hoyle v. State

554 So. 2d 672, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1990 WL 1081

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 11, 1990

DocketNo. 89-24

StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 672 (Hoyle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoyle v. State, 554 So. 2d 672, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1990 WL 1081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for sale of cocaine and possession of the same cocaine. Appellant urges it was error to convict for both crimes. Appellee says it agrees with appellant but that the error was in not following its oral pronouncement in court. See Green v. State, 446 So.2d 253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Venuti v. State, 437 So.2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Because both sides agree the judgment against appellant for the possession charge was mistakenly and unintentionally entered we reverse that judgment. The sentence is not affected so the conviction for delivery of cocaine and the sentence are affirmed. See also McKinney v. State, 553 So.2d 796 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for sale of cocaine and possession of the same cocaine. Appellant urges it was error to convict for both crimes. Appellee says it agrees with appellant but that the error was in not following its oral pronouncement in court. See Green v. State, 446 So.2d 253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Venuti v. State, 437 So.2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Because both sides agree the judgment against appellant for the possession charge was mistakenly and unintentionally entered we reverse that judgment. The sentence is not affected so the conviction for delivery of cocaine and the sentence are affirmed. See also McKinney v. State, 553 So.2d 796 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 So. 2d 672, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 117, 1990 WL 1081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyle-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack