Hoye v. Chatham Supermarkets, Inc.
This text of 195 N.W.2d 90 (Hoye v. Chatham Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff brought an action for damages which resulted from injuries sustained when she slipped and fell while leaving a supermarket maintained by defendants. After the plaintiff rested, the court below granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict of no cause of action.
We are unable to distinguish the facts of this case from those in Nash v. Lewis (1958), 352 Mich 488, and on authority of Nash we must, albeit reluctantly, affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 N.W.2d 90, 37 Mich. App. 438, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoye-v-chatham-supermarkets-inc-michctapp-1971.