Hoy v. Louden
This text of 152 N.W. 120 (Hoy v. Louden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions involved in this action are very similar to those in Hollenbeck v. Louden et al, 35 S. D. 320, 152 N. W. 116, heretofore decided. B-oth appeals were argued together. The opinion in the Hollenbeck case applies to this case as well. The judgment entered in this case is, in effect, in no manner in conflict with the decision in the Hollenbeck case. The intervening creditors, whose claims accrued during the time the Hollenbeck mortgage was withheld from record, dis[335]*335place Hollenbeck as to a portion of his debt secured by the first mortgage.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 N.W. 120, 35 S.D. 334, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoy-v-louden-sd-1915.