Hoy v. Lane
255 U.S. 566, 41 S. Ct. 447, 65 L. Ed. 789, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1294
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 28, 1921·No. No. 212; No. 213·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, 607; Pullman Co. v. Knott, 243 U. S. 447, 449; Shaffer v. Howard, 249 U. S. 200, 201. (2) Act of February 8, 1899, c. 121, 30 Stat. 822; LeCrone v. McAdoo, 253 U. S. 217, 219.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoy v. Lane, 255 U.S. 566, 41 S. Ct. 447, 65 L. Ed. 789, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1294 (1921).
255 U.S. 566 (Hoy v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herbert Brewer v. Hoxie School District No. 46 Of Lawrence County, Arkansas
238 F.2d 91 (Eighth Circuit, 1956)
Brewer v. Hoxie School District No. 46
238 F.2d 91 (Eighth Circuit, 1956)
Acheson, Secretary of State v. Fujiko Furusho. Ng Kwock Gee v. Acheson, Secretary of State. Wong Sho Ging v. McGranery Atty. Gen. Acheson, Secretary of State v. Lee Wing Bew
212 F.2d 284 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
Acheson v. Furusho
212 F.2d 284 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's Administratrix
23 S.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)