Hoy v. Hoy
This text of 143 A.D. 913 (Hoy v. Hoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
So much of the order as is appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the authority of Roake v. Palmer (119 App. Div. 64) and Johnson v. Ravitch (113 id. 810), and the proceedings are remitted to the Special Term to take proof of the fair and reasonable value of the services of the respondent Michael J. Walsh to date, for which sum he shall have a lien upon the interest of the appellants herein in the property which is the subject of this action, or in the proceeds of the sale thereof. Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoy-v-hoy-nyappdiv-1911.