Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

200 Misc. 242, 106 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 21, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A witness who is present in or just outside the courtroom may be required to testify notwithstanding the fact that he was not served with a subpoena.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hoestadteb, Edeb and Schbeibee, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp., 200 Misc. 242, 106 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

200 Misc. 242 (Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon Green Inc. v. Phillip
2026 NY Slip Op 26037 (NYC Civil Court, Kings, 2026)
MacDougall v. Board of Elections
133 A.D.2d 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Opinion No. (1979)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1979