Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.
200 Misc. 242, 106 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 21, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 200 Misc. 242 (Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp., 200 Misc. 242, 106 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
Opinion
A witness who is present in or just outside the courtroom may be required to testify notwithstanding the fact that he was not served with a subpoena.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hoestadteb, Edeb and Schbeibee, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Simon Green Inc. v. Phillip
2026 NY Slip Op 26037 (NYC Civil Court, Kings, 2026)
MacDougall v. Board of Elections
133 A.D.2d 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Opinion No. (1979)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1979
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
200 Misc. 242, 106 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howson-v-marlene-blouse-corp-nyappterm-1951.