Howser v. Evans

40 Ga. 157
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ga. 157 (Howser v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howser v. Evans, 40 Ga. 157 (Ga. 1869).

Opinion

Warner, J.

The error assigned to the judgment of the Court below, in this case, is in refusing to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was strongly and decidedly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to the charge of the Court. There is no error of law complained of in the rulings of the Court on the trial of the case. This Court has ruled at least one hundred times, that it would not control the discretion of the Court below, in refusing to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, when there was evidence in the record to sustain the verdict, and no rule of law was violated. We think the verdict of the jury, in this case, is cjiearly sustained by the evidence in [160]*160the record, and if parties will come here for the purpose of having the rule above stated re-affirmed, it is their legal right to do so, but it will be re-affirmed with ten per cent, damages, as provided by the 4221 section' of the Code, as the object in bringing it here, in view of the repeated rulings of this Court, must be for delay only.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed, and damages awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Blackwell
144 S.E. 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ga. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howser-v-evans-ga-1869.